How Many Calories Do You Burn Standing? A Simple Guide for Everyday Activity

That standing desk you bought thinking it would melt away pounds? Yeah, we need to talk about that.

Everyone's obsessed with finding the "easy" calorie-burning hack. I get it—who wouldn't want to torch calories just by... existing upright? The wellness industry has convinced us that standing desks are these magical weight loss miracles, turning your workspace into a fat-burning furnace.

Spoiler alert: standing isn't it.

Let's take a look at the actual science, crunch the numbers that matter, and look at what standing desks really (and don’t) do.

Table of Contents

The Science of Calorie Burn

Let's start with basics, because apparently the fitness industry forgot to mention what "burning calories" actually means. It's not some mystical fat-melting process. It's literally your body using energy to keep you alive and moving.

Your basal metabolic rate (BMR) is the calories your body burns just keeping your heart beating, lungs breathing, and brain functioning. Think of it as your body's rent payment: It's happening whether you're standing, sitting, or doing absolutely nothing productive on a Tuesday afternoon.

Scientists measure how many calories different activities burn using something called metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values. One MET equals the energy you use at complete rest. Sitting? That's about 1.5 METs. Standing? Around 1.8 METs. Walking at a casual pace? About 3.5 METs.

Understanding this stuff matters if you want real results instead of feel-good marketing nonsense, because when you know how calorie burn actually works, you can make choices that move the needle instead of throwing money at solutions that barely register on your metabolism's radar.

Standing Desks Are Overhyped As Calorie Burners

We need to just call out the marketing bullshit around standing desks and their miraculous calorie burn claims. These companies want you to believe that simply standing at work will transform your body weight and solve all your health problems.

The actual research? Standing burns about 0.15 calories per minute more than sitting. If I do the math for you, it is roughly 9 extra calories per hour. That's less than two M&Ms worth of energy.

Multiple clinical trials shows that reducing prolonged sitting has modest but meaningful health benefits, but they're not talking about dramatic weight loss. They're talking about reducing health risks associated with prolonged sitting—particularly for blood sugar control, insulin sensitivity, and cardiovascular markers. Yes, that is important, and it's not the calorie-torching miracle WFH influencers have been selling us on.

So, if you're using a standing desk solely to lose weight, you're gonna be disappointed. Like, really disappointed. The calorie burn difference is so minimal that you'd get more metabolic benefit from fidgeting while sitting than from standing perfectly still.

How Many Calories Do You Really Burn Standing?

Several factors influence calories burned standing: your body weight, muscle mass, how long you're upright, and whether you're one of those people who can't stand still (hello, fellow fidgeters!)

A 150-pound person burns approximately 107 calories standing for an hour versus 80 calories sitting. That's a whopping 27-calorie difference. A 200-pound person might burn around 143 calories standing versus 107 sitting which is a 36-calorie difference.

Individual variation matters here. Your coworker who swears standing burns tons of calories might be naturally more fidgety, have more muscle mass, or just be really bad at math. Your results won't match theirs, and that's completely normal.

Here's an example that puts this in perspective: to burn the equivalent of one medium apple (about 95 calories) through standing, you'd need to stand for about 3.5 hours longer than you would normally sit. That's not exactly efficient calorie management.

The Health Risks of Sitting (And Why Standing Helps... A Little)

Here's where I wish the marketing of these standing desks was more truthful. There are legitimate health risks associated with prolonged sitting. Research shows increased risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers when you're parked in a chair all day.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend reducing sitting time as part of overall health strategy. Higher amounts of daily sitting are associated with significantly increased risks of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, even after adjusting for physical activity.

Other research, like the 2012 study by van der Ploeg et al. in Archives of Internal Medicine, found adults who sat more than 11 hours per day were at a 40% increased risk of death from any cause compared to those who sat less than 4 hours.

With this context, standing does help with some of these health conditions. It can improve blood circulation, reduce back pain for some people, and might help with blood sugar regulation. But, and this is crucial, it's one teeny-tiny tool in a much bigger health picture, not a silver bullet.

It's also worth noting that people with certain health conditions like varicose veins or foot pain might find prolonged standing creates new problems while solving old ones.

The solution isn't to swing from one extreme (all sitting) to another (all standing). Instead, health professionals like myself want to see you be more flexible with movement and variety throughout your day, and a standing desk can do that.

And you need to remember that while standing reduces some health risks, it doesn't eliminate them. You still need regular physical activity, a reasonable exercise program, consistent quality sleep, to eat your veggies, and all those other boring healthy habits your mom was right about.

Weight Loss Reality: Why Standing Alone Won't Cut It

To lose weight, you need to maintain a caloric deficit. This means burning more calories than you take in through food. For most people, we're talking 350-500 calories per day to lose about a pound per week. Standing burns so few extra calories that it barely registers in this equation.

And now, let’s drag an old fitness cliché into the light: “You can’t out train a bad diet.” Is that line cringey? Absolutely. Is it also a little toxic when weaponized on social media by people who think oatmeal is “cheating” on their meal plan. Yup. But it’s got some real physiological teeth behind the eyeroll.

When it comes down to it, exercise is not your golden ticket creating the caloric deficit you need to lose weight. The calorie burn from even intense exercise doesn’t hold a candle to just… eating less food. 

You can crush a spin class and torch 500 calories, but that’s easily eclipsed by a single Starbucks scone. That’s why trying to “exercise off” a consistently high-calorie diet is like bringing a pool noodle to a sword fight.

And part of the reason exercise alone isn’t always enough is what researchers call 'energy compensation' — when your body subconsciously eats more or moves less to make up for calories burned. One study found people compensated for up to 84% of the energy they expended during exercise.

The real magic of exercise during weight loss isn’t the handful of calories you burn in a workout—it’s what movement does for your body while weight loss happens. Exercise helps you retain muscle, maintain metabolic health, regulate blood sugar, improve mood, and actually betters your odds of keeping the weight off long-term. 

Exercising is about equipping your body (and your sanity) for the changes it’s going through, not trying to erase a donut by doing twenty minutes on the stairmaster.

The CDC and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommend that healthy adults aim for at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity (think brisk walking, cycling, dancing—yes, chasing your dog counts if you’re out of breath) with at least two days a week of strength training.

For specific weight loss benefits, it is recommended to bump it up to 300 minutes weekly. Regardless of your goals, the studies consistently show the more movement the better.

I know that's not as sexy as, “Buy this desk and burn calories effortlessly,” but it’s what the research actually supports. Standing can help reset your posture and break up long periods of inactivity, but it’s not even in the same universe as the impact of regular exercise.

Burn Calories That Actually Matter

Want to increase daily calorie burn by being physically active without disrupting your desk job? There are strategies that actually would make a difference.

Walking meetings can burn 200-300 calories per hour, depending on your pace and body weight. That's actual meaningful energy expenditure, and if you walk at a moderate pace this time would count towards your recommended 150 minutes a week of exercise.

Set a timer to remind you to move every 30 minutes. Do desk exercises, walk to get water, or just pace while thinking. These movement breaks add up by keeping your muscles engaged and your joints lubricated.

Standing desks can be part of a broader health strategy when used correctly and with realistic expectations. By alternating between sitting and standing every 30-60 minutes to avoid fatigue and foot pain, this keeps you moving and active without creating new problems.

Don't Quit Your Day Job

Yes, standing burns slightly more calories than sitting, but it's not a weight loss miracle. The difference is so small it's almost negligible in the context of overall calorie burn and health.

The real benefits of standing aren't about dramatic calorie expenditure, they're about reducing health risks from prolonged sitting, improving energy levels, and supporting better posture. These matter, but they won't transform your body weight or replace actual exercise.

Use realistic expectations and sustainable changes. Standing can be one small part of a bigger health strategy that includes regular physical activity, strength training, and movement throughout your day. It's not the whole solution.

If you want significant calorie burn and weight loss, you need more than a fancy desk. You need consistent physical activity, exercise programs that challenge your body, and sustainable habits that create real energy expenditure.

• References

  Yates, T., Edwardson, C. L., Celis-Morales, C., Biddle, S. J. H., Bodicoat, D., Davies, M. J., Esliger, D., Henson, J., Kazi, A., Khunti, K., Sattar, N., Sinclair, A. J., Rowlands, A., Velayudhan, L., Zaccardi, F., & Gill, J. M. R. (2018). Metabolic effects of breaking prolonged sitting with standing or light walking in older South Asians and white Europeans: a randomized acute study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, 75(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly252

  Henson, J., Davies, M. J., Bodicoat, D. H., Edwardson, C. L., Gill, J. M., Stensel, D. J., Tolfrey, K., Dunstan, D. W., Khunti, K., & Yates, T. (2015). Breaking up prolonged sitting with standing or walking attenuates the postprandial metabolic response in postmenopausal women: a randomized acute study. Diabetes Care, 39(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1240

  Van Der Ploeg, H. P. (2012). Sitting time and All-Cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(6), 494. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2174

  Biswas, A., Oh, P. I., Faulkner, G. E., Bajaj, R. R., Silver, M. A., Mitchell, M. S., & Alter, D. A. (2015). Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1651

  Bailey, D. P., Hewson, D. J., Champion, R. B., & Sayegh, S. M. (2019). Sitting Time and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(3), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.015

  Riou, M., Jomphe-Tremblay, S., Lamothe, G., Stacey, D., Szczotka, A., & Doucet, É. (2015). Predictors of Energy Compensation during Exercise Interventions: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, 7(5), 3677–3704. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7053677

  Cox, C. E. (2017). Role of physical activity for weight loss and weight maintenance. Diabetes Spectrum, 30(3), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds17-0013

  Creasy, S. A., Rogers, R. J., Byard, T. D., Kowalsky, R. J., & Jakicic, J. M. (2015). Energy expenditure during acute periods of sitting, standing, and walking. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 13(6), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0419

  Bailey, D. P., Hewson, D. J., Champion, R. B., & Sayegh, S. M. (2019). Sitting Time and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(3), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.015

  Adult Activity: An Overview. (2023, December 20). Physical Activity Basics. https://www.cdc.gov/physical-activity-basics/guidelines/adults.html

  Saeidifard, F., Medina-Inojosa, J. R., Supervia, M., Olson, T. P., Somers, V. K., Erwin, P. J., & Lopez-Jimenez, F. (2018). Differences of energy expenditure while sitting versus standing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 25(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317752186